Users Online: 1892
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
MINI SYMPOSIUM: COLORECTAL CANCER: EDITORIAL
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 70-71

Adjuvant colon cancer chemotherapy: Is there an Indian standard of care?


Department of Medical Oncology, Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Adelaide SA, Australia

Date of Web Publication15-Apr-2013

Correspondence Address:
Rohit Joshi
Department of Medical Oncology, Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Adelaide SA
Australia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.110490

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Joshi R. Adjuvant colon cancer chemotherapy: Is there an Indian standard of care?. South Asian J Cancer 2013;2:70-1

How to cite this URL:
Joshi R. Adjuvant colon cancer chemotherapy: Is there an Indian standard of care?. South Asian J Cancer [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 23];2:70-1. Available from: http://journal.sajc.org/text.asp?2013/2/2/70/110490

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality world-wide. Patients have a 40-50% chance of disease relapse after complete surgical resection. [1]

Multiple clinical trials have established that adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is standard of care for Stage III disease. A relative risk reduction in mortality of 30-35% in favor of chemotherapy versus surgery alone translates into 10% absolute survival improvement at 5 years. [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8]

The benefit for patients with a node negative (Stage II) disease is less clear. Two meta-analyses found no definitive benefit of chemotherapy in Stage II patients; [9],[10] However, the QUASAR study showed a statistical improvement in the risk of recurrence (22.2% vs. 26.2%) and survival (80.3% vs. 77.4%) with adjuvant therapy. [11] A post-hoc subgroup analysis of patients with Stage II disease in the MOSAIC study showed an improvement trend in 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in the high-risk subgroup (T4 disease, perforation, obstruction, <10 nodes examined, poorly differentiated histology or extramural vascular invasion) of patients; 84.9% with FOLFOX and 79.8% with 5-FU-leucovorin (LV) (hazard ratio 0.72, confidence interval 0.48-1.08). [12] This evidence suggests a small survival benefit for adjuvant therapy in selected cases of Stage II disease. The MOSAIC data may translate into an absolute gain of about 8% with oxaliplatin-based regimens when compared to no treatment, particularly in patients with high-risk features.

The X-ACT study compared capecitabine and iv 5-FU/LV Mayo clinic regimen in patients with resected Stage III disease, and showed a trend towards superiority of capecitabine in both DFS (HR 0.87, CI 0.75-1.0) and overall survival (HR 0.84, CI 0.69-1.01). [13]

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and biological agents have shown benefit in the metastatic setting and were thus studied in the adjuvant setting. The MOSAIC trial showed an increase in 3-year DFS in the oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 combination arm (78.2% vs. 72.9%) compared with LV5FU2 alone. [12] Neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 arm; however, the rate of febrile neutropenia was 1.8% and rate of death during the treatment was similar in both groups at 0.5%. The NSABP C-07 study using the FLOX regimen versus 5-FU/LV showed a 3-year DFS of 76.5% and 71.6% respectively, with a HR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.93) in favor of FLOX. [14] The CALGB 89803 and PETACC 3 studies using irinotecan in combination with 5-FU failed to show a benefit for irinotecan in the adjuvant setting. [15],[16] The NSABP-C08 and AVANT trials did not show any benefit of adding bevacizumab to adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX. These studies have established oxaliplatin/5FU as the standard of care for Stage III disease.

The newer treatment regimens are subject to discussion with regard to toxicity and costs. The intergroup trial N9741 found that 62% of patients withdrew from treatment with FOLFOX for reasons other than disease progression (23% due to myelosuppression and 23% due to neurotoxicity. [17]

The estimated cost of 8 weeks of treatment for metastatic disease with the Mayo clinic regime of 5-FU is US$ 63, with FOLFOX is US$ 11,889 and for FOLFOX plus bevacizumab is US$ 21,033. [18] These costs are only for medications and not the cost of administration, supportive medications or treating complications. The MOSAIC trial extrapolated within-trial data to estimate a benefit in overall life expectancy. This was estimated to be 1.17 years benefit in the oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 arm compared with LV5FU2 alone. The cost per life year gained was estimated to be US$ 27,300. [19]

Ahmad, et al. should be appreciated for doing a study to look at the Indian scenario with regard to bowel cancer. Bowel cancer does not seem to be the biggest cancer issue for doctors in India; however, the landscape is changing and this would be a major problem soon. It is important to do more studies to highlight local issues with regard to finances, ease of transportation for patients and toxicities involved.

The patient numbers in this study (Stages 2 and 3) are too small to make any definitive recommendations or suggest a change in practice guidelines. The authors must collaborate with other cancer centers across the state/country and generate more data, which could be subjected to pre-defined rigorous statistical analysis. The massive numbers of patients in the Indian scenario are not truly reflected in the number and quality of research papers presented or published across the world.

It should be standard practice to discuss the option of chemotherapy with patients, whilst outlining the potential toxicities. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of treatments also including financial and physical costs of toxicities is becoming increasingly important and strategies to optimize the same are vital.

We need to balance efficacy of treatment, costs involved with the short- and long-terms toxicities to create a truly Indian standard of care for adjuvant colon cancer.

 
  References Top

1.Obrand DI, Gordon PH. Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:15-24.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in colon cancer. International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT) investigators. Lancet 1995;345:939-44.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Haller DG, Macdonald JS, Mayer RJ. Fluorouracil (FU), leuconorin (LV) and levamisole (LEV) adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: Five-year final report of INT-0089. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998;17:256a.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.O'Connell MJ, Laurie JA, Kahn M, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Erlichman C, Shepherd L, et al. Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:295-300.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.O'Connell MJ, Mailliard JA, Kahn MJ, Macdonald JS, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, et al. Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:246-50.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Wolmark N, Rockette H, Fisher B, Wickerham DL, Redmond C, Fisher ER, et al. The benefit of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary colon cancer: Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-03. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1879-87.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Wolmark N, Rockette H, Mamounas E, Jones J, Wieand S, Wickerham DL, et al. Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:3553-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Zaniboni A. Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil: Impact on disease-free survival and overall survival. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2432-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Benson AB 3 rd , Schrag D, Somerfield MR, Cohen AM, Figueredo AT, Flynn PJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3408-19.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Figueredo A, Charette ML, Maroun J, Brouwers MC, Zuraw L. Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: A systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in evidence-based care's gastrointestinal cancer disease site group. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3395-407.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Gray RG, Barnwell J, Hills R, McConkey C, Williams N, Kerr D. QUASAR: A randomised study of adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation including 3238 colorectal cancer patients. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004;23:Abstract #3501.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2343-51.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP, Abt M, Burris H 3 rd , Carrato A, et al. Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2696-704.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Kuebler JP, Wieand HS, O'Connell MJ, Smith RE, Colangelo LH, Yothers G, et al. Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: Results from NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2198-204.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Saltz LB, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Goldberg RM, Hantel A, Thomas JP, et al. Irinotecan fluorouracil plus leucovorin is not superior to fluorouracil plus leucovorin alone as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer: Results of CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3456-61.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Van Cutsem E, Labianca R, Bodoky G, Barone C, Aranda E, Nordlinger B, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing biweekly infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin alone or with irinotecan in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer: PETACC-3.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;2:3117-25.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Ashley AC, Sargent DJ, Alberts SR, Grothey A, Campbell ME, Morton RF, et al. Updated efficacy and toxicity analysis of irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX): Intergroup trial N9741 in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 2007;110:670-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Schrag D. The price tag on progress: Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:317-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Aballéa S, Chancellor JV, Raikou M, Drummond MF, Weinstein MC, Jourdan S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of oxaliplatin compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in the US. Cancer 2007;109:1082-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1378    
    Printed42    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded194    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal